anybodies: (glower)
anybodies ([personal profile] anybodies) wrote in [community profile] ataraxion2015-01-11 02:38 am

text | 04. project results

This is Mystique again.

I'm reporting on the results of the Jump clock project. I won't recap the details there.

EXTERNAL MEASURE (passenger-fabricated)
Jump 37: 1,829 hours
Jump 38: 391 hours
Jump 39: 6,578 hours
INTERNAL MEASURES (shipboard systems)
Jump 37: 0 hours
Jump 38: 0 hours
Jump 39: 0 hours

These reports will be ongoing. I strongly advise that the next time anyone debarks, make an effort to estimate the time that's transpired since our stop on Arima.

Analyses and interpretations are welcome. Please be aware that our efforts at external videography failed. Basically, the Jump movement destroyed the equipment. I'll update about the trans-hull cartography project when there's something to update about. A bunch of weird and context-free numbers counts as 'something.'

I would like to commission timekeeping devices not linked to the native system as well, in the time between now and Van Rijn destroying us. Anyone up for it?
immuno: (why it's such a big deal tho.)

[personal profile] immuno 2015-01-11 08:28 am (UTC)(link)
I'd love to get a look at what you're using to draw these measurements. Has anyone been looking at distance? Cartography would be a good place to start, if we can create some three-dimensional star maps and generate our own reference points.
immuno: (i know you only want to own me.)

[personal profile] immuno 2015-01-11 08:38 am (UTC)(link)
I have the skills, but I wouldn't say I have the familiarity with the level of technology aboard the ship yet.

It wouldn't take much: I'd need a program that could store scale images in a three dimensional grid.

And, of course, use of whatever radar and shuttles this ship has for short-range exploration to take concrete measurements with. At least, if we want a real map instead of an overglorified star chart.
technologist: (418)

[personal profile] technologist 2015-01-11 08:50 am (UTC)(link)
I'm familiar with the tech.

[ Hello, nice to meet you. Jk just abrupt interruptions and no introductions, it took him like ten minutes to decide to send this much. ]
immuno: (i'm your wonder maid.)

[personal profile] immuno 2015-01-11 08:53 am (UTC)(link)
And do you know of any ways to use it to develop something like what I mentioned?
technologist: (427)

[personal profile] technologist 2015-01-11 09:06 am (UTC)(link)
[ Well. ]

The problem's going to be with the jumps, obviously. Since the ship isn't moving, the fixed points can't be

[ Can't be ??? Except just not finishing a text looks more like not finishing a text than a cue, so a bit later: ]

can we not text?
immuno: (rule number four.)

voice:

[personal profile] immuno 2015-01-11 09:09 am (UTC)(link)
[ With a sigh, Lydia turns on the audio for her comms, and notes: ]

What are you, forty? Should I get you a landline? [ Rhetorical questions. She moves right along to a real one. ] Can't be what?
technologist: (341)

voice;

[personal profile] technologist 2015-01-11 09:23 am (UTC)(link)
[ Wow jk can we go back to text or just go back to not talking maybe. But he ignores the taunting and gets right back to the point, if a bit indirectly. ]

They can't be— well, they won't be fixed, technically. [ That isn't quite right. The wording isn't, anyway, but he just moves forward instead of trying to clarify. ] And depending on the distance, it could take us months just to... triangulate?
immuno: (you tell me one thing.)

voice;

[personal profile] immuno 2015-01-11 09:29 am (UTC)(link)
Won't be fixed because ... ? [ Oh. Wait. She knows this. The sound of fingers snapping. ] Because the jump folds space, it doesn't move the ship. We're the objects that are fixed.

I highly doubt any government would sanction a project that was scrambling the universe, though—I have to imagine it's putting everything back where it found it once we've made the move. If we can just chart the layout of the stars in relation to one another, we should still be able to run a scan and develop a schematic that tells us, then, where we are in relation to where we used to be.

Presuming, of course, that we remain within a reasonable distance of where we used to be. Mystique's readings could put us, well, anywhere.
Edited 2015-01-11 09:32 (UTC)
technologist: (448)

voice;

[personal profile] technologist 2015-01-11 09:47 am (UTC)(link)
[ A slightly stunned pause. What he was going for and then some; he'll take it, though there is that vague, annoying feeling of someone stealing your thunder. ]

Yeah. Except it is scrambling something. We should be fixed in place, not time. I think.

[ Pretty sure. Kind of difficult to go from 'talking theoreticals with other nerds at lunch' to 'jump technology is real'. ] Or there's the, um— the time dilation. Or whether or not the stars are... if it's been much longer outside, then the stars could be...

[ Moving, except there's a specific term for it that he's missing. It loses importance a second later, anyway. ] But then how are they following us?
immuno: (wanna be adored.)

voice;

[personal profile] immuno 2015-01-11 09:52 am (UTC)(link)
Then the stars could be aging and the other objects could be gravitating, too. [ Hmm. Good point. ] At most, though, those numbers account for—what, nine months maybe? Nothing significant enough to alter readings on an universal scale, at least not for stars. Nor significant enough to prevent someone very determined from catching up—particularly if they have jump technology, as well. They certainly understood it well enough.

[ Which is to say, someone crawled out of the grav couch this month and caught up on reading the npc post she missed. ]

Better than I do. [ Which she hates admitting, but really needs to. This is all out of her depth, but she's luckily got an adaptive, critical enough mind to keep up and roll with it. ]
technologist: (373)

voice;

[personal profile] technologist 2015-01-12 07:21 am (UTC)(link)
[ Nailed it. Meaning there isn't much else to say, and instead he gets hung up on that admission. After an uncertain pause: ]

Have you been to Engineering?
immuno: (and we start becoming lovers.)

voice;

[personal profile] immuno 2015-01-12 07:43 am (UTC)(link)
Not yet. Why? Is there anything worth looking at?

what a dramatic icon

[personal profile] technologist - 2015-01-12 07:50 (UTC) - Expand

which one

[personal profile] immuno - 2015-01-12 07:52 (UTC) - Expand

hahha the b&w

[personal profile] technologist - 2015-01-12 07:55 (UTC) - Expand

oh yeah

[personal profile] immuno - 2015-01-12 08:18 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] technologist - 2015-01-12 08:23 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] immuno - 2015-01-12 08:52 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] technologist - 2015-01-12 09:00 (UTC) - Expand
immuno: (stars that burn the brightest.)

[personal profile] immuno 2015-01-11 08:59 am (UTC)(link)
Don't be modest: you've already contributed plenty. We know that the jumps last for staggered time intervals now. Hopefully, as they continue, your readings will be able to establish some kind of usable pattern for us to even predict the duration of the next one. If this continues to work, and we combine our resources, down the road, we might even be able to predict our trajectory.
immuno: (of all of your preaching.)

[personal profile] immuno 2015-01-11 08:42 pm (UTC)(link)
Well, it sounds like Fitz has the charting technology under control, which leaves ... Can you fly a shuttle or point me in the direction of someone who can?
immuno: (a little loss of innocence.)

[personal profile] immuno 2015-01-13 05:39 am (UTC)(link)
I'd really appreciate if you'd ask him about it. You can call it allowing you to if you want, but I'd think of it as you doing me a favor.
immuno: (i know you only want to own me.)

[personal profile] immuno 2015-01-16 05:20 am (UTC)(link)
Fitz hasn't gotten in touch with me about engineering the equipment. I'll hunt him down. We'll probably need this jump to put something together, at least.

(no subject)

[personal profile] immuno - 2015-01-17 06:48 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] immuno - 2015-01-19 20:12 (UTC) - Expand
technologist: (388)

[personal profile] technologist 2015-01-11 09:08 am (UTC)(link)
[ Wow no pressure :') but really thanks you're the best ]

Hi. And thanks. I think we should maybe talk, though
technologist: (446)

[personal profile] technologist 2015-01-12 07:18 am (UTC)(link)
Not on the network. I think.
I'll contact you in a bit.