![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png){kind=small}
[ VIDEO ]
Contact.
[ will sounds like he's giving a lecture when he comes on the screen. he's looking directly into the camera — it's easier to make eye contact with a device. ]
That's the key to all this. If you're receiving foreign sensation, you need to track down the person it originated with and make skin-to-skin contact. It'll stop the side-effects, and eventually — hopefully — break the connection. Doesn't have to be more personal than a handshake.
[ a pause, and he glances down, off-camera, visibly discomfited by the fact that the hand not holding his device is in the grip of another. ]
An... extended handshake. Whatever timer this thing is working on, we think letting go resets it.
[ the screen’s upended as sherlock hijacks the device, settling on his face (at an admittedly slightly awkward angle) a moment later. ]
But in the meantime— I’m sure you’ve all noticed that the physical links are current, unlike the memories, and arguably offer us a great deal more control. Passive sensations are the exception, but if I were to hypothetically hit my hand — as our resident neurologist has demonstrated — then Mr. Graham would feel it. [ and by hypothetically he means he's tested it, several times. ]
In the case of mutual sensations, like, say, holding one’s hand, this creates a unique feedback loop; the sensation of their hand in yours, and yours in theirs, et cetera. [ speaking of hand-holding, holding will’s hand is getting in the way of his usual gesturing; the screen's unsteady as a result. ] While I'm reluctant to test the theory with present company — no offense — I imagine this could apply to other neutral or positive sensations. If one were to engage in sexual intimacy with their link partner, for instance, then the moment of—
[ in another blur of abrupt motion, will takes his device back — and also his hand. no offense. ]
Better reset the clock to zero, Mr. Holmes.
[ will sounds like he's giving a lecture when he comes on the screen. he's looking directly into the camera — it's easier to make eye contact with a device. ]
That's the key to all this. If you're receiving foreign sensation, you need to track down the person it originated with and make skin-to-skin contact. It'll stop the side-effects, and eventually — hopefully — break the connection. Doesn't have to be more personal than a handshake.
[ a pause, and he glances down, off-camera, visibly discomfited by the fact that the hand not holding his device is in the grip of another. ]
An... extended handshake. Whatever timer this thing is working on, we think letting go resets it.
[ the screen’s upended as sherlock hijacks the device, settling on his face (at an admittedly slightly awkward angle) a moment later. ]
But in the meantime— I’m sure you’ve all noticed that the physical links are current, unlike the memories, and arguably offer us a great deal more control. Passive sensations are the exception, but if I were to hypothetically hit my hand — as our resident neurologist has demonstrated — then Mr. Graham would feel it. [ and by hypothetically he means he's tested it, several times. ]
In the case of mutual sensations, like, say, holding one’s hand, this creates a unique feedback loop; the sensation of their hand in yours, and yours in theirs, et cetera. [ speaking of hand-holding, holding will’s hand is getting in the way of his usual gesturing; the screen's unsteady as a result. ] While I'm reluctant to test the theory with present company — no offense — I imagine this could apply to other neutral or positive sensations. If one were to engage in sexual intimacy with their link partner, for instance, then the moment of—
[ in another blur of abrupt motion, will takes his device back — and also his hand. no offense. ]
Better reset the clock to zero, Mr. Holmes.
permavoice!!
permatext!! maybe
Sherlock admit it you love using voice with Annie
No one has a bee hobby that involves conversations with dead bees.
no never!!!
The bee held sentimental value. & talking at ≠ conversation.
no subject
no subject
no subject
How did you know that was the bee?
no subject
no subject
no subject
[ what is your problem with the bee!! ]
no subject
You named her?
no subject
Named the bees after her.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
[ he knows, but he'll let you explain anyway. ]
no subject
no subject
[ he disagrees, obviously. ]
no subject
no subject
[ he could probably write dissertations about how great joan is, but that's a bit too touchy feely, so. ]
Read the stories? [ you've hidden it so well!! ]
no subject
I did see the Great Mouse Detective as a child. Does that count?
no subject
[ that's it, that's the text. this is the first he's heard about a mouse version. ]
no subject
no subject
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)