[ VIDEO ]
Contact.
[ will sounds like he's giving a lecture when he comes on the screen. he's looking directly into the camera — it's easier to make eye contact with a device. ]
That's the key to all this. If you're receiving foreign sensation, you need to track down the person it originated with and make skin-to-skin contact. It'll stop the side-effects, and eventually — hopefully — break the connection. Doesn't have to be more personal than a handshake.
[ a pause, and he glances down, off-camera, visibly discomfited by the fact that the hand not holding his device is in the grip of another. ]
An... extended handshake. Whatever timer this thing is working on, we think letting go resets it.
[ the screen’s upended as sherlock hijacks the device, settling on his face (at an admittedly slightly awkward angle) a moment later. ]
But in the meantime— I’m sure you’ve all noticed that the physical links are current, unlike the memories, and arguably offer us a great deal more control. Passive sensations are the exception, but if I were to hypothetically hit my hand — as our resident neurologist has demonstrated — then Mr. Graham would feel it. [ and by hypothetically he means he's tested it, several times. ]
In the case of mutual sensations, like, say, holding one’s hand, this creates a unique feedback loop; the sensation of their hand in yours, and yours in theirs, et cetera. [ speaking of hand-holding, holding will’s hand is getting in the way of his usual gesturing; the screen's unsteady as a result. ] While I'm reluctant to test the theory with present company — no offense — I imagine this could apply to other neutral or positive sensations. If one were to engage in sexual intimacy with their link partner, for instance, then the moment of—
[ in another blur of abrupt motion, will takes his device back — and also his hand. no offense. ]
Better reset the clock to zero, Mr. Holmes.
[ will sounds like he's giving a lecture when he comes on the screen. he's looking directly into the camera — it's easier to make eye contact with a device. ]
That's the key to all this. If you're receiving foreign sensation, you need to track down the person it originated with and make skin-to-skin contact. It'll stop the side-effects, and eventually — hopefully — break the connection. Doesn't have to be more personal than a handshake.
[ a pause, and he glances down, off-camera, visibly discomfited by the fact that the hand not holding his device is in the grip of another. ]
An... extended handshake. Whatever timer this thing is working on, we think letting go resets it.
[ the screen’s upended as sherlock hijacks the device, settling on his face (at an admittedly slightly awkward angle) a moment later. ]
But in the meantime— I’m sure you’ve all noticed that the physical links are current, unlike the memories, and arguably offer us a great deal more control. Passive sensations are the exception, but if I were to hypothetically hit my hand — as our resident neurologist has demonstrated — then Mr. Graham would feel it. [ and by hypothetically he means he's tested it, several times. ]
In the case of mutual sensations, like, say, holding one’s hand, this creates a unique feedback loop; the sensation of their hand in yours, and yours in theirs, et cetera. [ speaking of hand-holding, holding will’s hand is getting in the way of his usual gesturing; the screen's unsteady as a result. ] While I'm reluctant to test the theory with present company — no offense — I imagine this could apply to other neutral or positive sensations. If one were to engage in sexual intimacy with their link partner, for instance, then the moment of—
[ in another blur of abrupt motion, will takes his device back — and also his hand. no offense. ]
Better reset the clock to zero, Mr. Holmes.
no subject
Each...
Sexual intimacy, really? Aren't there children on this ship?
no subject
[ and he's not touching the sexual intimacy thing thanks. ]
no subject
That you live next door, not that he's in your head, that doesn't sound comfortable at all.
no subject
[ besides, better sherlock than some of the strangers he's been thoroughly ignoring earlier in the month. ]
no subject
[She's really nervous about the whole...touching thing.]
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
[Not exactly true but good enough.]
no subject
no subject
Are you all right?
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
text!
[ get it, bees. ]
permavoice!!
permatext!! maybe
Sherlock admit it you love using voice with Annie
No one has a bee hobby that involves conversations with dead bees.
no never!!!
The bee held sentimental value. & talking at ≠ conversation.
no subject
no subject
no subject
How did you know that was the bee?
no subject
no subject
no subject
[ what is your problem with the bee!! ]
no subject
You named her?
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)