snaketrap: (Through the plundered groves)
Damian Hughes | Di(s). ([personal profile] snaketrap) wrote in [community profile] ataraxion2012-07-11 05:47 pm

oo1. t e x t

Good evening, Tranquility.
Shall we discuss ?


[ All individual entries are high encryption. Hackable with some work or by extreme skill ( re: JARVIS, etc ]

001 » 012 -- Natasha Romanoff
This seems to be a trend for you.


002 » 083 -- Thor Odinson
Everything leaves in the end. What does that say about you, Odinson?


002 » 023 -- (2009) Sherlock Holmes

If the entity is not human, and passengers on board are not human, what then stops residents from provoking it, exactly?


001 » 198 -- (BBC) Sherlock Holmes
You have been here since the ship began bringing foreign bodies in, correct?


008 » 095 -- Charles Xavier
The child lies, Asgardians are dangerous.

saidhe: (shut up. they are not real.)

text; 100% encryption

[personal profile] saidhe 2012-07-12 03:26 am (UTC)(link)
remarkably little about the functions of the ship therein, though potentially in part due to a lack of experts on actively controlled wormholes capable of reaching through all of time, space, and parallel existences. i couldn't say i blame them.

herding? a small amount, though admittedly not especially earnestly.
saidhe: (i pity you)

text; 100% encryption

[personal profile] saidhe 2012-07-13 05:07 pm (UTC)(link)
fine, then, let's just say the astrophysical side has never been a particular intrigue of mine.

because the end result would have been a predictable one and i'm not much a fan of impossible endeavors. alternatively, it's really not my job.
saidhe: (iron man it's got a nice ring to it)

text; 100% encryption

[personal profile] saidhe 2012-07-13 05:22 pm (UTC)(link)
realizing i just defeated the general populace, rather.

i'd say by all rights, i've deserved a question or two by now. why do you ask?
saidhe: (don't look at me right now)

text; 100% encryption

[personal profile] saidhe 2012-07-13 05:30 pm (UTC)(link)
oh, heavens no. you're absolutely right there.

but doing relatively nothing is much better than engaging in a fool's errand and serving only to fully exasperate myself by engaging in the mental/emotional equivalent of beating my head into a brick wall. by all rights, i may even break through it eventually, but so much untoward pain when i could merely find an alternative route.

who are you hiding from?
saidhe: (are those uggs john)

text; 100% encryption

[personal profile] saidhe 2012-07-13 05:38 pm (UTC)(link)
and i have already partaken in that which is plenty foolish enough. a mind scorned, then?

and thus far your name, your face, your very voice is your own. you are naught but a number - and a new one, in fact, which is why i stand to reasonable apprehension about someone who has so very much to hide so quickly.
saidhe: (i am incredible)

text; 100% encryption

[personal profile] saidhe 2012-07-13 06:12 pm (UTC)(link)
[ He might have an inkling. Perhaps because Loki's not the only one with a smile of sorts here. ]

perhaps, but time will be the true indicator.

you see, because i am in the shadows. i work from them regularly, just out of sight, and i see no sign of you here. shadows are deep, true, but they do reveal some. shapes, outlines, mere suggestions. numbers reveal little beyond your length of stay, and so i would say you work behind a partition before the shadows, and we've already established how i feel about walls.

better yet, you work behind a mask; quite publicly you ask a question when very few will know very much about you here other than the ostensible. which similarly makes it appropriate that you ask about smiley.