look: made for me, please don't take. (Default)
disney princess will graham ([personal profile] look) wrote in [community profile] ataraxion2013-10-28 07:25 am

[ VIDEO ]

Contact.

[ will sounds like he's giving a lecture when he comes on the screen. he's looking directly into the camera — it's easier to make eye contact with a device. ]

That's the key to all this. If you're receiving foreign sensation, you need to track down the person it originated with and make skin-to-skin contact. It'll stop the side-effects, and eventually — hopefully — break the connection. Doesn't have to be more personal than a handshake.

[ a pause, and he glances down, off-camera, visibly discomfited by the fact that the hand not holding his device is in the grip of another. ]

An... extended handshake. Whatever timer this thing is working on, we think letting go resets it.

[ the screen’s upended as sherlock hijacks the device, settling on his face (at an admittedly slightly awkward angle) a moment later. ]

But in the meantime— I’m sure you’ve all noticed that the physical links are current, unlike the memories, and arguably offer us a great deal more control. Passive sensations are the exception, but if I were to hypothetically hit my hand — as our resident neurologist has demonstrated — then Mr. Graham would feel it. [ and by hypothetically he means he's tested it, several times. ]

In the case of mutual sensations, like, say, holding one’s hand, this creates a unique feedback loop; the sensation of their hand in yours, and yours in theirs, et cetera. [ speaking of hand-holding, holding will’s hand is getting in the way of his usual gesturing; the screen's unsteady as a result. ] While I'm reluctant to test the theory with present company — no offense — I imagine this could apply to other neutral or positive sensations. If one were to engage in sexual intimacy with their link partner, for instance, then the moment of—

[ in another blur of abrupt motion, will takes his device back — and also his hand. no offense. ]

Better reset the clock to zero, Mr. Holmes.
2leftfeet: (chi ursae majoris)

[personal profile] 2leftfeet 2013-10-29 12:08 am (UTC)(link)
As far as invisible sentient approval goes, sure. It felt non-threatening in the moment. [Is that really saying much?] After: less so, though I can't really say if that was just an instinctual reaction or if it was some kind of outside influence.

[Because the sensation of being watched, even if its with approval, doesn't really sit well.]
virtuoso: (127)

[personal profile] virtuoso 2013-10-31 06:43 pm (UTC)(link)
Like the memories, then? Foreign, theoretically not your own. A unique reaction in the moment vs. in retrospect may imply a continuation of intrusive thoughts.
2leftfeet: (delta cygni)

[personal profile] 2leftfeet 2013-11-01 02:14 am (UTC)(link)
Thinking about it now, I definitely don't think it was something coming from me. It didn't feel out of place at the time though. So yes: pretty much like the memories.
virtuoso: (034)

[personal profile] virtuoso 2013-11-01 06:47 am (UTC)(link)
Thank you.

[ for filling out this survey

and yes that's it what's casual conversation, who cares. ]
2leftfeet: (Default)

disconnect

[personal profile] 2leftfeet 2013-11-04 07:49 am (UTC)(link)
Sure. Good luck.

[Because Shepard is soooooo good at that.]