look: made for me, please don't take. (Default)
disney princess will graham ([personal profile] look) wrote in [community profile] ataraxion2013-10-28 07:25 am

[ VIDEO ]

Contact.

[ will sounds like he's giving a lecture when he comes on the screen. he's looking directly into the camera — it's easier to make eye contact with a device. ]

That's the key to all this. If you're receiving foreign sensation, you need to track down the person it originated with and make skin-to-skin contact. It'll stop the side-effects, and eventually — hopefully — break the connection. Doesn't have to be more personal than a handshake.

[ a pause, and he glances down, off-camera, visibly discomfited by the fact that the hand not holding his device is in the grip of another. ]

An... extended handshake. Whatever timer this thing is working on, we think letting go resets it.

[ the screen’s upended as sherlock hijacks the device, settling on his face (at an admittedly slightly awkward angle) a moment later. ]

But in the meantime— I’m sure you’ve all noticed that the physical links are current, unlike the memories, and arguably offer us a great deal more control. Passive sensations are the exception, but if I were to hypothetically hit my hand — as our resident neurologist has demonstrated — then Mr. Graham would feel it. [ and by hypothetically he means he's tested it, several times. ]

In the case of mutual sensations, like, say, holding one’s hand, this creates a unique feedback loop; the sensation of their hand in yours, and yours in theirs, et cetera. [ speaking of hand-holding, holding will’s hand is getting in the way of his usual gesturing; the screen's unsteady as a result. ] While I'm reluctant to test the theory with present company — no offense — I imagine this could apply to other neutral or positive sensations. If one were to engage in sexual intimacy with their link partner, for instance, then the moment of—

[ in another blur of abrupt motion, will takes his device back — and also his hand. no offense. ]

Better reset the clock to zero, Mr. Holmes.
blasphemous: (sick sense of humor)

[personal profile] blasphemous 2013-10-28 03:15 pm (UTC)(link)
If anyone starts humming Rocky Horror songs... [This is really not the ideal situation to be in.]

How did you two figure this out? [Was it teamwork? Did you guys hug it out?]
virtuoso: (049)

text!

[personal profile] virtuoso 2013-10-28 08:42 pm (UTC)(link)
Experimentation.

[ is that too vague. he's leaving it there. ]
blasphemous: (rumours)

... sigh... text.

[personal profile] blasphemous 2013-10-28 08:43 pm (UTC)(link)
sounds fun and exciting.
virtuoso: (079)

just be glad he's typing shit out for will now

[personal profile] virtuoso 2013-10-28 08:45 pm (UTC)(link)
Experimentation usually is.

Mr. Graham might disagree.
blasphemous: (when I die)

meg is not a delicate flower though...

[personal profile] blasphemous 2013-10-28 08:47 pm (UTC)(link)
It's a word that definitely got my attention.

[Of course, the fun thing is always going to be that she can take almost anything in stride. Torture, years in hell... no problem.]
virtuoso: (049)

[personal profile] virtuoso 2013-11-01 06:58 am (UTC)(link)
Some might question your sense of priorities.

[ says the guy who made this about orgasms. ]
blasphemous: (Default)

[personal profile] blasphemous 2013-11-08 02:39 am (UTC)(link)
would that some be you?
virtuoso: (033)

[personal profile] virtuoso 2013-11-11 05:27 am (UTC)(link)
Not at all. No point in having new experiences if you have no intention of exploring them to their fullest.
blasphemous: (want to start)

[personal profile] blasphemous 2013-10-31 11:09 pm (UTC)(link)
So your text-enthused friend mentioned.

Aren't you the one that had the mystery meat science project too?
blasphemous: (when I die)

[personal profile] blasphemous 2013-11-08 02:38 am (UTC)(link)
Anything come of that?