oo2. ( video | the second birdsong )

[ownership]

[ The feed clicks on. +1 Rosella, looking blankly at the screen. It's actually a pretty lengthy beat, though it's more thoughtful than that thousand yard stare might suggest. Considering who this is, though... Not always easy to tell. The camera is centered to a perfect frame of her shoulder-up and while the lights are dim, there's probably only a very small handful of people who, you know. Start out their feeds that quasi-ominously.

The silence is quickly replaced by a sharp frown. It's a little jarring, to see such an aggressive expression on a previously empty face. ]

As operational parameters are different here, I have a personal query for operatives and competent civilians, new or old. Do you consider the previous mission history of either myself or others relevant in our new enviroment?

Comments

text;

[puppydogeyes]

[Taylor isn't sure she likes where this is going.]

Relevance can be dependent on specific context.

video for tyke sempai!!!

[ownership]

We are onboard the vessel Tranquility. [ It could be read as kind of a duh, but instead Rosella just looks kind of mildly frustrated. ] Does this require further paring down?

[puppydogeyes]

Mission history varies.
Circumstances vary even within a limited environment.
You're being too general for a direct + accurate answer.

video|

[firstofficer]

Relevancy would be dependent upon the skills and experience one possesses from time spent in their previous continuum. Without elaboration, confirmation or denial cannot be accurately provided.

video|

[ownership]

Is this a request for an inventory of my capabilities?

video|

[firstofficer]

It is a response to your query.

Audio

[still_alive]

That would depend on what the previous history was.

video;

[ownership]

So you acknowledge that it is parameter specific, not situational.

[fuckinghysterical]

[LB stares at the screen, blinking with interest.]

I suppose I wouldn't be the best person to ask -- eeheeheehee -- but do you mean as in personal history or the objectives they needed to complete in their mission?

[ownership]

I acknowledge that there are civilians on this ship, so I will make allowances for personal history, though my query assumes experience in having both options be synonymous.

[fuckinghysterical]

Well, in my case, the mission I was given - ah - let's just say that it can't be completed here. Eeheehee -- but I guess as far as the events that shaped all of us? I'd say it's pretty relevant to who we are now.

[text]

[wolfdreamer]

Do you mean true missions or do you only mean past history?

video;

[ownership]

[ Rosella blinks. ]

Are not all missions true?

[ She may have missed the point a little. ]

text;

[wolfdreamer]

Perhaps. A true mission would be a mission given officially but there might be some more true than others. And true missions are different than people's past and histories.

Encrypted 100% |

[certainproclivity]

[Oh, hello you. Yes, you. He's been paying very close attention to you, Ms. Operative.]

I imagine that highly depends on who you're speaking with and what skills you're willing to offer them.

piggyback encrypt | 100%

[ownership]

Is this a request for mission history or my own capabilities?

[ Well. No beating aroud the bush, then. ]

text;

[predictor]

[Even if his voice and face is out there, now. Text is still... easier to communicate through.]

No.

Unless you're still operating within mission parameters.

video;

[ownership]

I am not. I have been designated new ones by Operative Tyke.

[ But even then, well. Rosella's jaw tightens; frustration, again. ]

I do not understand. Do our failures not matter on-board?

video; OPERATIVE ENCRYPTIONS 95% if you're natasha romanoff you can see this.

[aimlessness]

Depends. I think it is, but I've got specific reasons for that.

video | OPERATIVE FAM-BAM ENCRYPT (piggyback)

[ownership]

Hello, Clint. [ A blink, then two. No smiling, but Rosella's not exactly not-glad to see you. Or something. ]

Then you consider previous histories relevant in our interactions with others onboard the vessel?

[video]

[circumitus]

Negative. Mission would not be feasible to carry out within these perimeters, anyway. Though I suppose it would also depend on the subject of the mission.

[video]

[ownership]

That is a given considering the potentially hostile nature of our enviroment.

VIDEO | OPERATIVE ENCRYTPTION; 100% | visible to rosella, clint, and natasha.

[widowing]

I take that history into consideration and keep it in mind when dealing with others, but don't always consider it to be relevant to the situation at hand.

VIDEO | OPERATIVE ENCRYTPTION; 100%

[ownership]

[ A frown. ]

What causes this distinction? Why is it irrelevant?

voice;

[bonus]

Why, yes. Yes I do.