humanistic: (think - i retract that bit)
John Mitchell ([personal profile] humanistic) wrote in [community profile] ataraxion2013-05-01 08:22 pm

voice

[...there's a second of white noise, because-- well, this is weird. It's like online chatrooms, which Mitchell has never been keen on, to say the least. One on one communication hasn't been so bad--better, actually, considering he's been mostly holed up in his room, avoiding human/werewolf contact. But, right--necessity--]

If people are going t' go through those tubes and get onto that other ship, do their phones keep on working? These devices, I mean. Do they go that far? If they do, and if this can be heard over there, I'm making a request. Space pirates had to have cigarettes on them, yeah, and I'm in need of cigarettes. Sanctioned looting can include a bit of personal stuff, yeah-- and it's sort of a, a desperate need. Please and thanks in advance.

[Like very desperate. Like the more he talks about it, the more strained his voice goes. Vampires with nicotine addictions, it's a hard life. A pause, then, he might finish there--but instead he sucks in a breath. Right. Normal.]

Actually, there's a lot of questions on how things work around here, and not all of it is out of our control. Like--so there's a cast of, what, a hundred plus of us, and we have t' trade for things that we need, if someone else has got them. But if you don't have anything t' trade, is it just-- begging for it? Hoping for a bit of Christian charity? Every man for himself? Not that I'd be much surprised by that one, given the... [Maybe it's better not to finish that one, in light of recent events, but given his low faith in humanity, and given his own recent exploints, none this is really all that surprising. So, wry once more:] ...given the situation.

[An awkward pause.]

Anyways. Thanks again.
jurisimpudent: (tetchy)

[voice]

[personal profile] jurisimpudent 2013-05-06 03:04 pm (UTC)(link)
[That hits a nerve.]

And what exactly gives you the right to stand in judgment over what I must do in service to my duties?
jurisimpudent: (undah presshah)

[voice]

[personal profile] jurisimpudent 2013-05-06 03:45 pm (UTC)(link)
[A scoff.]

Human feeling is precisely what you should not have if you are going to judge people. Emotion clouds logic, and decisions should be made purely along the principles of law. Allowing human feeling means allowing judgment to be undermined by hatred, or by weakness.
jurisimpudent: (staring)

[voice]

[personal profile] jurisimpudent 2013-05-06 10:16 pm (UTC)(link)
[And Edgeworth isn't sure whether or not to answer it as a question; in the end, he nods - ]

That's right.
jurisimpudent: (i tried)

[voice]

[personal profile] jurisimpudent 2013-05-07 04:43 am (UTC)(link)
When I'm done for the day, I just go to sleep so that I can do the same thing the next day.

[But that's a glib answer; after a moment, he shakes his head - ]

But - that is how it works, to an extent, yes. Is that so very hard to believe, sir?
jurisimpudent: (contemptuous)

[voice]

[personal profile] jurisimpudent 2013-05-07 01:33 pm (UTC)(link)
[He pauses, then shakes his head.]

Not precisely, no. What I would believe is...consistent. The difference is that inside the classroom, it's my duty to set aside my beliefs in favor of arguing what I am impelled to argue.
jurisimpudent: (stressed)

[voice] I am and have always been Miles Edgeworth

[personal profile] jurisimpudent 2013-05-07 02:39 pm (UTC)(link)
[A pause, and a frown - ]

I think you are the first person who has told me that. But it's certainly simpler than taking one's emotions with oneself into the courtroom. Cleaner, as well. And more fair.
jurisimpudent: (stressed)

[voice] Ummmmmmm we are married on the REAL plane. I found a person with his name and married him.

[personal profile] jurisimpudent 2013-05-07 03:37 pm (UTC)(link)
That's right. Fair to them, and fair to the person for whom I am advocating. Look - [Since he said he didn't know about that - ] You have, in your life, no doubt, hated someone. Correct?
jurisimpudent: (stressed)

[voice] HAHAHAHA like I would set foot on a plane

[personal profile] jurisimpudent 2013-05-07 04:49 pm (UTC)(link)
[He doesn't ask.]

And say you were asked to stand in front of a judge and argue for them to be punished. Do you think it's particularly fair to them to stand up there and allow yourself to speak from that place of hatred? Or would you sooner rely on evidence? Logic? Reason?
jurisimpudent: (i tried)

[voice] you'll have to come to me I suppose /flutters lashes

[personal profile] jurisimpudent 2013-05-07 05:29 pm (UTC)(link)
[And he hesitates. This conversation is suddenly straying rather too close to...certain topics...for his comfort.]

If there is no judge, then it is not proper judgment. Judgment must always be rendered by a disinterested third party with wisdom and a thorough knowledge of law, after being presented with two well-argued sides. It must be clean and civilized.
jurisimpudent: (stressed)

[voice] :')

[personal profile] jurisimpudent 2013-05-07 06:07 pm (UTC)(link)
[But Edgeworth isn't one to let something like this out of his teeth. It might make him uncomfortable, but he doesn't back off.]

So what do you suggest as an alternative, then? Mob justice? Tearing wrongdoers to pieces? Or inflicting back on them precisely what they did to others? Would that be a solution? Whom would we ask to dirty their hands with that?
jurisimpudent: (stressed)

[voice]

[personal profile] jurisimpudent 2013-05-07 06:40 pm (UTC)(link)
It's a nice thought.

[Edgeworth's voice gentles, at least. He thinks that Mitchell is on the other side of the equation. A wronged party. Someone who's lost someone.]

But justice is retribution. It's not revenge. We don't enjoy it; we do not like to kill, to hurt, any one of us. So it has to be a strictly calibrated thing - a punishment to fit the crime, to cause all to fear being caught without straying into cruelty.

Even if we might want to cause those who have done harm to truly suffer, we cannot, because that will leave us worse for it. It will rob us of that which we discussed before: humanity. Mercy. Decency. So instead, it must be civilized, and cool-headed, because when we go to excess because we want to that is when we do it because we enjoy it. And that is when we are no longer just; that is when we are murderers ourselves.
jurisimpudent: (broody)

[voice]

[personal profile] jurisimpudent 2013-05-07 08:36 pm (UTC)(link)
I'm of the opinion that most criminals are.

[That's said harshly, savagely; he's not exaggerating. But a moment passes, and the surge of anger fades; then he shakes his head, and he changes his answer to something more civilized.]

Then so be it. That doesn't change anything about what I said. Indeed, it merely underlines it: if we allow ourselves to be swayed by horror or fury at the work of a true monster, then again, we allow ourselves to be moved by cruelty. And when cruelty and personal will enter into it, then that is killing because we want to.

[voice]

[personal profile] jurisimpudent - 2013-05-07 21:59 (UTC) - Expand

[voice]

[personal profile] jurisimpudent - 2013-05-08 00:48 (UTC) - Expand

[voice]

[personal profile] jurisimpudent - 2013-05-08 02:17 (UTC) - Expand

[voice]

[personal profile] jurisimpudent - 2013-05-08 03:09 (UTC) - Expand

[voice]

[personal profile] jurisimpudent - 2013-05-08 14:16 (UTC) - Expand

[voice]

[personal profile] jurisimpudent - 2013-05-08 16:52 (UTC) - Expand

[voice]

[personal profile] jurisimpudent - 2013-05-08 17:43 (UTC) - Expand

[voice]

[personal profile] jurisimpudent - 2013-05-08 18:27 (UTC) - Expand

[voice]

[personal profile] jurisimpudent - 2013-05-08 20:28 (UTC) - Expand

[voice]

[personal profile] jurisimpudent - 2013-05-09 15:51 (UTC) - Expand

[voice]

[personal profile] jurisimpudent - 2013-05-09 18:18 (UTC) - Expand

[voice]

[personal profile] jurisimpudent - 2013-05-10 17:30 (UTC) - Expand