100% encrypted; text to voice function enabled; locked from wardnik

[coffeeking]

HELLO You're probably confused. Take some time to read this over. We do our best to keep it up to date and it should answer most of your questions. Note: This guide is in the process of being overhauled and is therefore slightly out of date in some areas. You may also experience some downtime. Please bear with us and excuse our mess. GENERAL INFORMATION » WHAT HAPPENED, WHERE YOU ARE, WHAT TO DO IN DEPTH INFORMATION » AS MUCH DETAIL AS WE COULD FIND WARNING » ABOUT THE ENTITY KNOWN AS ☺ FAQ » BECAUSE WE'RE SICK OF ANSWERING THE SAME QUESTIONS HEADCOUNT » CURRENT NUMBER OF PEOPLE ABOARD THE SHIP WITH ACTIVE COMMUNICATORS SPACE TRAINING » IF THIS IS YOUR FIRST TIME ABOARD A SPACE SHIP, PLEASE WATCH THESE HELPFUL VIDEOS COMMUNITY NOTCEBOARD » SO NO ONE DIES OF BOREDOM OR LACKS SOMETHING THEY NEED [ADDITIONAL IC/OOC INFO] [OOC INFO ABOUT THIS PAGE] Please address any additional questions to the network. Don't trust Ward and Resnik. - Indictus & Aethalides cambitas

Comments

text|

[entrapments]

i want the flowers back.

anon text;

[lawyer]

So has anybody tried writing a ship constitution? Not even a full system of law but just a constitution, some established precedents besides this helpful page.

[anon text]

[ryuuzaki]

It's good to see you back.

anon permatext|

[coffeeking]

Complain, complain. We'll keep it under consideration.

anon text;

[coffeeking]

Officially? No. Unofficially, don't get Edgeworth started. You might try asking Nathan Petrelli about it, though.

anon permatext

[coffeeking]

Thanks. Having the network down certainly didn't do us any favors.

same same

[ryuuzaki]

No.

It might be worthwhile to develop a protocol for how to address the situation if it happens again. For example, designate several volunteers who would be willing to disseminate the information privately, or willing to hold instructional meetings.

text;

[extrospector]

Why is this so long? No one's actually going to read all of this.

[ He did. He's just complaining. ]

[entrapments]

i prefer "constructive criticism"

anon text;

[lawyer]

Nathan Petrelli know a thing or two about law then?

[coffeeking]

I should think there are a number of people who do that already. The problem being that they can't do a thing if they're in a stasis coma.

anon permatext

[coffeeking]

Your loss. Cliffnotes aren't sufficient.

anon text;

[coffeeking]

I should hope so, him being a United States senator. Then again, if he doesn't, it might explain a thing or two about US politics.

[coffeeking]

And this must be what they mean by the old phrase, "everyone's a critic." Tell you what, go track down everyone who objected to the flowers and everyone else who agrees with you, have a lively debate about it, and come back with whatever compromise you've come up with. We'll comply with whatever decision you make.

[entrapments]

can i just punch them until they submit instead?
debating is hard :c

[coffeeking]

I absolutely do not sanction this in any official capacity, but I'm not saying no.

[extrospector]

Why not? They're fine for almost everything else. That or sparknotes.

anon text;

[lawyer]

Don't get me started on that, but thanks for the advice.