Then we should institute the training and evaluations. But to be honest, we're all going to have to operate at a certain level of trust, combined with a certain level of wariness. You could say that those of us working in Comms should undergo psychological evaluations, but what's the benchmark for 'acceptable'? And who decides? And what kind of professional evaluation has the person doing that deciding undergone? Then what about the other departments? Have those in Security undergone evaluations, and should they? We could just as easily find ourselves in a situation where someone on the security team abuses the power they're afforded. Or in a situation where someone working in Engineering puts us all in danger.

I've no argument against some kind of process to put people in positions of command, to an extent, like department heads or something. But I don't think we're in a situation where we're ever going to have absolute agreement on anything. People are going to have to just let us prove that we can and will do the jobs we've chosen to take on.